DK Havenergi
DK Vindkraft
DK Solenergi
DK PtX
DK Innovation
DK CCS

Grenaa Port criticizes report on Aarhus port expansion

One of four alternatives for a port expansion in Aarhus is a collaboration with Grenaa Port, but here the port director is critical of the report's conclusions about area and CO2 costs.
2. FEB 2023 12.45
Havne
Klima
Plan & Byg
Teknik & Miljø
Transport

NORDDJURS / AARHUS: Director of Grenaa Port Henrik Carstensen sharply criticizes the report that Aarhus Municipality includes in the decision on an expansion of Aarhus Port, writes Jyllands-Posten. In response to the criticism, Aarhus Mayor Jacob Bundsgaard (S) responded in writing: "The information from the director of the Port of Grenaa is new and surprising to me. I would therefore ask the Port of Aarhus, which commissioned the report from HBS, to clarify the matters in the report that have been criticized."

As previously mentioned, the report from the consulting firm HBS analyzes four alternatives for a new large Outer Harbor, of which cooperation with the Port of Grenaa is one of them.

Here, the consulting firm concludes, among other things, that the Port of Aarhus, in collaboration with the Port of Grenaa, can reduce its area requirement by 3.5 hectares - by moving 276,000 tons of bulk goods (ed.: loose, unpackaged bulk goods).

And in addition, according to the consulting firm, CO2e emissions will increase by 4,900 tons over 50 years, calculated at 7,200 tons more as a result of additional road transport offset by 2,300 tons for a reduced Outer Harbor.

Do not recognize numbers

- We read the report as if we can only make 3.5 hectares available, but we can make an area of ​​30 hectares available. So there is quite a big difference. We cannot recognize the CO2 calculations they come up with at all. It doesn't make sense that we have to deal with some customers who are located in the vicinity of Aarhus. Then you can talk about a bad CO2 account. But it is not the customer groups we are talking about at all, but the goods that may be going to Herning, Silkeborg, Hobro or Randers, says port director Henrik Carstensen. Partner at HBS Economics Esben Anton Schultz rejects the criticism.

- I think that part of the criticism is due to a misunderstanding of our task. We have not had the task of assessing whether any of the current goods can be moved to Grenaa, but only the future goods, which of course create the need for the outer harbour. We have also not had the task of assessing how much free capacity there is at Grenaa Port, but only the possibility of moving some of the future goods from Aarhus Port to Grenaa Port, he tells the newspaper.

cwa

 

Text, graphics, images, sound, and other content on this website are protected under copyright law. DK Medier reserves all rights to the content, including the right to exploit the content for the purpose of text and data mining, cf. Section 11b of the Copyright Act and Article 4 of the DSM Directive.

Customers with IP agreements/major customer agreements may only share Danish Offshore Industry articles internally for the purpose of handling specific cases. Sharing in connection with specific cases refers to journaling, archiving, or similar uses.

Customers with a personal subscription/login may not share Danish Offshore Industry articles with individuals who do not themselves have a personal subscription to Danish Offshore Industry.

Any deviation from the above requires written consent from DK Medier.

https://www.doi.dk/en/havenergi/artikel/grenaa-havn-kritiserer-rapport-om-aarhus-havneudvidelse

GDPR