DK Havenergi
DK Vindkraft
DK Solenergi
DK PtX
DK Innovation
DK CCS
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has ruled that Norway did not violate human rights by allowing oil companies to drill in new areas. (File photo). - Photo: Frederick Florin/Ritzau Scanpix

Court rejects climate activists' case against Norway: New oil drilling was not a human rights violation

There was no violation of human rights when Norway allowed new oil drilling in 2016, a court rules.
28. OKT 2025 11.03
Klima

It was not a violation of human rights when Norway granted permits for oil drilling in the Arctic in 2016. This is what the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has ruled, according to the Reuters news agency.

The case stems from a decision the Norwegian state made in 2016. Here, the country's Ministry of Energy issued ten licenses that allowed companies to search for oil in a new area in the Barents Sea north of Norway. This happened the year after the Paris Agreement was adopted.

It is Greenpeace Norway, the Norwegian environmental organization Natur & Ungdom and six climate activists who have sued the Norwegian state. In 2020, the Norwegian Supreme Court ruled that the oil drilling did not violate the Norwegian constitution.

However, the environmental organizations and activists believed that the drilling had endangered the environment and deprived young people of their right to life. Therefore, they took the case to the European Court of Human Rights.

The European Court of Human Rights receives complaints from individuals and states. The decisions of the court are legally binding on the state in question. However, all European states that have joined the court must continuously follow the decisions that are made.

The states are therefore obliged to adjust their legislation and practice so that they comply with the decisions of the ECHR. In April 2024, the court ruled in three other climate cases. This was the first time that it had to deal with climate law cases of principle.

Here, two lawsuits were dismissed, while in the last case it was decided that Switzerland had violated human rights in some cases. The case was brought by a group of elderly Swiss women who believed that Switzerland had not introduced sufficient national policies to tackle climate change.

The plaintiffs pointed out that as elderly women they are more at risk than other groups of citizens of dying during heat waves as a result of climate change.

/ritzau/
 

Text, graphics, images, sound, and other content on this website are protected under copyright law. DK Medier reserves all rights to the content, including the right to exploit the content for the purpose of text and data mining, cf. Section 11b of the Copyright Act and Article 4 of the DSM Directive.

Customers with IP agreements/major customer agreements may only share Danish Offshore Industry articles internally for the purpose of handling specific cases. Sharing in connection with specific cases refers to journaling, archiving, or similar uses.

Customers with a personal subscription/login may not share Danish Offshore Industry articles with individuals who do not themselves have a personal subscription to Danish Offshore Industry.

Any deviation from the above requires written consent from DK Medier.

https://www.doi.dk/en/havenergi/artikel/domstol-afviser-klimaaktivister-mod-norge-nye-olieboringer-var-ikke-menneskerettighedsbeud

GDPR