DK Havenergi
DK Vindkraft
DK Solenergi
DK PtX
DK Innovation
DK CCS

Failed offshore wind projects in the North Sea trigger lawsuits in the US

Austrian Strabag demands billions in compensation from the German state after interrupted investments in offshore wind power.
14. APR 2025 11.55
Energi
Erhverv
EU
Internationalt

Two subsidiaries of the Austrian group Strabag are now trying to force Germany to pay compensation for lost investments in offshore wind in a court in Washington, D.C. The two companies believe they are entitled to almost 241 million euros (approximately 1.8 billion DKK) in compensation and a further 92.5 million euros (approximately 700 million DKK) in interest. This is what the German Spiegel writes.

- With this case, we are exercising our right to receive the compensation that we have been awarded, said a spokeswoman for Strabag. According to the company, the German state has not responded to a payment request.

The two companies had previously been successful in the case at the World Bank's arbitration court, where they were awarded compensation of almost 241 million. euros (approx. 1.8 billion DKK) and just over 92.5 million euros (approx. 700 million DKK) in interest.

According to their own information, Strabag's two companies invested approximately 122 million euros (approx. 910 million DKK) in offshore wind projects in the North Sea. According to them, the value of these investments fell significantly as a result of a change in Germany's renewable energy law.

The requirement is based on the Energy Charter Treaty, an international agreement on the protection of energy investments, from which Germany has, however, withdrawn. In the case, the German Ministry of Economics (*Federal Ministry for Economics and Climate Protection*) unsuccessfully referred to a decision by the European Court of Justice that invalidates the treaty in an EU legal context.

Trade expert Fabian Flues from the German NGO Powershift believes that the case shows how private arbitration courts can disregard applicable EU law.

“The new federal government must ensure that such cases cannot take place in the future,” says Fabian Flues, a trade expert at Powershift.

The German Ministry of Economics did not want to comment on the case to Spiegel.

Denmark has also decided to leave the treaty, citing the fact that it could hinder the green transition. However, cases will still be able to be brought against Denmark for a 20-year period after withdrawal.

jel

Text, graphics, images, sound, and other content on this website are protected under copyright law. DK Medier reserves all rights to the content, including the right to exploit the content for the purpose of text and data mining, cf. Section 11b of the Copyright Act and Article 4 of the DSM Directive.

Customers with IP agreements/major customer agreements may only share Danish Offshore Industry articles internally for the purpose of handling specific cases. Sharing in connection with specific cases refers to journaling, archiving, or similar uses.

Customers with a personal subscription/login may not share Danish Offshore Industry articles with individuals who do not themselves have a personal subscription to Danish Offshore Industry.

Any deviation from the above requires written consent from DK Medier.

https://www.doi.dk/en/havenergi/artikel/glippede-havmoelleprojekter-i-nordsoeen-udloeser-soegsmaal-i-usa

GDPR